Modern Greek Oral Narratives in Context: Cultural Constraints and Evaluative Ways of Telling
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper focuses on personal (experience) storytelling in Modern Greek, a little explored discourse type, yet particularly vital and salient in the culture. Using as its data a corpus of naturally occurring stories in companies of intimates as well as a corpus of adults’ stories for children, the study presents their major evaluative resources. The aim of the discussion is to look into the contextualisation aspects of these resources, that is, to establish interpretive links between the stories’ formal choices and their situational and cultural context. At the textual level, it is shown that the category prevailing in the affective component of Greek stories between adults is what will be called the proximal evaluation. This serves the creation of a global performed mode which, contextually speaking, invokes and is shaped by the cultural agenda of functions underlying everyday narrative construction. By contrast, evaluation in stories to children proves to be less internalised, by heavily relying on "markers of intensity" and a specific case of audience-adaptation devices named "schema-driven". The motivations for this choice are traceable to the change of the stories’ narrative purposes shaped by their culturally constrained "recipient design". In addition to shedding light on the contextsensitivity of Greek stories’ evaluative "grammar", the above findings prove to be immediately relevant to the ways in which the society’s continuum of oraland literate-based discourse practices is shaped. (
منابع مشابه
Role of L1 and L2 in the Organization of Iranian EFL Lived Narratives
People are constrained by their culture and social life when telling stories. A second language learner then cannot be expected to tell stories in the target language without cross-cultural effects that influence the way of narration. The present study examined the role of the first language (L1) and second language (L2) in the organization of narratives by focusing on Persian speakers’ and EFL...
متن کاملTragic Vision: Similarities and Departures in the Tragic Vision of O’Neill and Aeschylus
In this paper, I have explored the genesis of modern tragedy through a comparison between t Aeschylus’ Oresteia and Eugene O’Neill’s Mourning Becomes Electra. O’Neill has reworked the Oresteian Trilogy by placing his characters in the modern cultural context. Although there are similarities in both the tragic narratives yet I have focused on the points of departure to highlight the differences ...
متن کاملNarratives in Cypriot Greek mono- and bilingual children with SLI
Narrative ability is one of the most promising ways to assess communicative competence in children: Coordination of lexical, morphosyntactic, phonological, and pragmatic elements is needed to produce narrations. Narratives might even serve as a diagnostic tool for Specific Language Impairment, since children with Specific Language Impairment are reported to have difficulties producing (oral) na...
متن کاملIllness and narrative
The article gives a review of the last ten years' of research on illness narratives, and organises this research around certain central themes. Four aspects of illness narratives are discussed: 1. a proposed typology giving three different kinds of illness narratives illness as narrative, narrative about illness, and narrative as illness; 2. considerations of what can be accomplished with the h...
متن کامل‘Telling Tales’: Exploring Narratives of Life and Law within the (Mock) Jury Room
In a context in which current prohibitions under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 prevent research into the substantive content of real jury deliberations, the ways in which jurors in criminal trials in England and Wales approach the task of reaching collective verdicts remains the subject of considerable conjecture. This has necessitated the use of simulation studies to replicate as far as possi...
متن کامل